电脑桌面
添加51搜公文到电脑桌面
安装后可以在桌面快捷访问

UBS Economics-Global Economic Perspectives _The inflation impact of the sp...-106001199.pdfVIP专享VIP免费优质

UBS Economics-Global Economic Perspectives _The inflation impact of the sp...-106001199.pdf_第1页
1/9
UBS Economics-Global Economic Perspectives _The inflation impact of the sp...-106001199.pdf_第2页
2/9
UBS Economics-Global Economic Perspectives _The inflation impact of the sp...-106001199.pdf_第3页
3/9
ab17 January 2024Global Research and Evidence LabPowered byUBS Evidence LabYESGlobal Economic PerspectivesThe inflation impact of the spike in global shipping costs is likely (very) smallThe disruption to global sea freight is significantGlobal shipping costs since mid-November have increased 115%, and as much as 250% on some of the China-to-Europe routes. Attacks by Houthi militants in Yemen on ships passing through the Red Sea have significantly disrupted shipping routes, and led at least part of the trade through the Suez Canal and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait to be diverted round the Southern tip of Africa (adding about 9 days for an average journey between Taiwan and the Netherlands, for instance). We show in Figure 1-6 how the daily volume of trade passing through the Suez Canal and Bab el-Mandeb strait has fallen by about 2.2-2.4 million metric tons (40-45%) since mid-November, while that around the Cape of Good Hope has increased by 1.7 mln metric tons (+34%).And our global supply chain tracker has deteriorated by nearly 1½ stdev One question we've been getting from clients is whether this has led to a renewed surge in our global supply chain tracker, and whether this poses a risk to the global disinflation that had been taking hold in recent months. Figure 10 shows how our supply chain stress tracker has shifted from -0.95 stdev below normal to +0.44 stdev above normal (this is for the median; the simple average has shifted from -0.93 stdev to +0.62 stdev). That seems like a large shift, though clearly nothing like what we had at the height of pandemic bottleneck stress. But this is very different from the Pandemic supply chain stressThe reason our bottleneck tracker jumps so much is largely because of its makeup: in our 20 indicator tracker we have 4 shipping cost variables which had a 4 stdev move higher, versus only 0.3 stdev deterioration for everything else. Most of our delivery time indicators aren't picking up anything yet, despite 12% of global trade passing through the Red Sea. We would argue that the Red Sea disruption is a lot less impactful than what happened to supply chains in the Pandemic because (i) there are no supply shortages (e.g. chips shortages to produce goods); (ii) there is no excess demand for goods (pandemic spending patterns have dissipated) and (iii) there are no container shortages (global trade is in recession). Moreover, although delivery of goods takes longer and is more expensive, the delay is measured in days and not months or quarters.The impact from shipping costs alone to inflation is likely very smallAlthough freight costs skyrocketed during the pandemic, these had relatively little to do with the inflation surge. As we show in Figure 9, the cost of freight and insurance, as a % of total US import costs for instance, increased from roughly 2.7% to just 4.1%, des...

1、当您付费下载文档后,您只拥有了使用权限,并不意味着购买了版权,文档只能用于自身使用,不得用于其他商业用途(如 [转卖]进行直接盈利或[编辑后售卖]进行间接盈利)。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。
3、如文档内容存在违规,或者侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权等,请点击“违规举报”。

碎片内容

UBS Economics-Global Economic Perspectives _The inflation impact of the sp...-106001199.pdf

您可能关注的文档

无忧公文+ 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

确认删除?
QQ
  • QQ点击这里给我发消息
回到顶部